| |
Description
SS464: Homeland
Security complements several Department of Social Sciences courses
on terrorism, part of the newly-dedicated General Wayne A. Downing
Terrorism Studies Program, as well as terrorism-related courses in
other departments. SS464 and its companion course SS474: Terrorism
and Counterterrorism, are the two mandatory courses for West Point’s
new minor in terrorism studies.
SS464 provides
future leaders with a broad understanding of the homeland security
challenge. Students learn about the major policy and institutional
reforms underway in the homeland security policy area, examine
whether these changes are improving or will improve U.S. security,
and develop their own views on the direction of national homeland
security policy. By the end of the course, students gain a solid
intellectual foundation to think critically and creatively about
America’s efforts to prevent terrorist attacks within the United
States, reduce our vulnerability to terrorist attack, and minimize
the damage and recover from attacks that may occur.
In spring semester, 2006, SS464
will feature several guest
lecturers and a planned two-day trip to Boston, Massachusetts to
visit federal, state, local, and private sector homeland security
officials and organizations.
As an advanced
liberal arts course, SS464 places a premium on informed
participation and clear, analytic writing. Graded requirements
include class participation, two policy memoranda, a group exercise
structured as a mock congressional hearing, lesson and guest lecture
synopses, a trip section synopsis, a final paper, and a take-home
Term End Exam (TEE).
-
Provide
aspiring officers with a thorough understanding of the homeland
security challenge, and the manner with which homeland security
is similar to, and different from, other national security
challenges.
-
Develop an
understanding of how homeland security policy intersects with
domestic policy, and the unique challenges that homeland
security poses to competing national priorities such as
international trade.
-
Develop an
understanding of the doctrinal foundations of current homeland
security policy and how it fits with related but distinct policy
areas: combating terrorism, counterproliferation, and homeland
defense.
-
Develop an
understanding of the international dimensions of homeland
security policy, and how those dimensions interact with the
whole of U.S. foreign policy.
-
Foster an
appreciation of state, local, and private sector roles and
responsibilities in homeland security.
-
Develop an
understanding of the appropriate role of the military in
homeland security.
-
Acquire a
theoretical and practical understanding of moral, ethical,
organizational, legal, fiscal, and cultural challenges to
improving homeland security.
-
Acquire
sufficient perspective and knowledge to critically evaluate
whether homeland security policies, individually or
cumulatively, pose a risk to American values, civil liberties,
or way of life.
-
Develop a basic
understanding of interagency and intergovernmental processes,
and foster an awareness of the skills necessary for military
officers to work effectively with civilian counterparts across a
broad range of professional disciplines.
-
Foster the
ability to develop creative approaches to border security,
transportation security, intelligence and warning, domestic
counterterrorism, critical infrastructure protection, and
emergency preparedness and response.
-
Develop the
ability of aspiring officers to conduct critical analysis, both
written and oral, of the issues that are examined in the course.
-
Develop an
intellectual curiosity that leads towards a lifetime of
learning.
-
In addition to
the course’s stated objectives, students will gain some insight
into the institution of the presidency, and the organization,
operation, and reform of executive branch agencies. Thus,
students will find that, in addition to SS474 (Terrorism), SS493
dovetails with SS373 (American Presidency) and SS376
(Organizational and Bureaucratic Politics).
Stephen Flynn,
America the
Vulnerable: How our Government is Failing to Protect us from
Terrorism, (New York: Harper
Collins Publishers, 2004).
Philip B.
Heyman, Terrorism Freedom and Security: Winning Without War
(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003).
Russ Howard, Joanne Moore, and James Forest,
eds., Homeland Security and Terrorism: Readings and
Interpretations (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005).
Mark A. Sauter and James Jay
Carafano, Homeland Security: A Complete Guide to
Understanding, Preventing, and Surviving Terrorism, (New
York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 2005).
National
Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States, The 9/11
Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on
Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. (New York,
NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2004).
Michael E. O'Hanlon,
Peter R. Orszag, Ivo H. Daalder, I. M. Destler,
David L. Gunter, James M. Lindsay, Robert E. Litan, James B.
Steinberg, Protecting the American Homeland: One Year On
(Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2002). |
|
Structure
Block I -
Understanding the Nature of the Terrorist Threat (lessons 1-5). Block 1 examines the nature of the
threat posed by terrorists and global terrorist networks,
particularly those which have or seek the capability to carry
out catastrophic attacks. The intent of Block 1 is not to build an in-depth understanding of particular
terrorist groups, motivations, tactics, or history (SS474:
Terrorism and Counterterrorism is the Department of Social
Sciences course that explores these issues), but rather to consider the
threat from a "net assessment" perspective. Just as
experts and officials, beginning in the late 1940s, considered
how the nature of the nuclear weapons threat changed the
international security environment and American foreign policy
and national security policy, we pursue a similarly broad
perspective with respect to the new (and permanent) strategic
reality of catastrophic terrorism. What are the important
characteristics of the terrorist threat that America and other
nations face in the foreseeable future? How do these
characteristics shape homeland security policy?
Block 2 -
Emergency Preparedness and Response (lessons 6-9).
In Block 2, we dive in to the
substance of homeland security. The National Strategy
for Homeland Security establishes three objectives; in
priority order they are: (1) prevent terrorist attacks within
the United States, (2) reduce America's vulnerability to
terrorism, and (3) minimize the damage and recover from attacks
that do occur. The strategy also establishes six critical
mission areas: (1) intelligence and warning, (2) border and
transportation security, (3) domestic counterterrorism, (4)
critical infrastructure protection, (5) defending against
catastrophic threats, and (6) emergency preparedness and
response.
The critical mission areas parallel
the lifecycle of the terrorist threat, from its genesis beyond
our shores, to the execution and aftermath of attacks within the
United States. The first three mission areas generally
correlate to the first objective; the next two to the second
objective; and the last to the third objective.
Block 2 examines the National
Strategy's third objective and its corresponding critical
mission area. The course follows the structure above,
starting from the "inside out" -- doing so exposes students to
policies which are more accessible and with which they are most
likely to have an existing baseline of understanding.
Doing so also best allows us to examine the nature of the
homeland security policy area early in the course.
Throughout the course, within
each critical mission area, we explore such questions as:
-
What is the
mission area’s scope? (breadth of policy, organizations,
manpower, resources, statutory authorities, etc.) What does it
include? What does it not include?
-
How important
is the mission area? What should we seek to accomplish?
-
What is the
status of the Nation’s efforts in the mission area? Are we
succeeding? Failing? On-course? Off-track?
-
What are the
current laws and policies relevant to the mission area? Are new
laws or policies needed?
-
What challenges
or impediments make progress difficult in the mission area?
-
What policy
tools are available to achieve progress in the mission area?
What are their costs, benefits, and appropriateness?
-
With what other
priorities or policies does the mission area intersect or
compete? Which are more or less important, and why?
-
What should we
seek to accomplish within the next year, five years, ten years?
Block III – Understanding the Nature of
the Homeland Security Policy Area (lessons 10-14).
Having examined the issues and
policies associated with emergency preparedness and response,
Block 3 explores the specific characteristics of the homeland
security policy area, which differs from the traditional national
security policy area in important ways. In Block 2, we
established a foundation for us to consider how best to organize
for and coordinate homeland security policy, questions which we
will continuously revisit throughout the course. In
addition, an important objective of SS464 is for future national
security leaders to develop an understanding of national
policymaking, interagency coordination, and the intersection of
domestic policy and foreign policy. Block 3 focuses on this
objective.
Block IV - Reducing America's
Vulnerability to Terrorism (lessons 15-21). Block 4 examines the National
Strategy's second objective and its corresponding mission areas of critical infrastructure protection and
defending against catastrophic threats.
Block V - Preventing Terrorist
Attacks within the United States (lessons 22-36). Block V explores the National
Strategy's most important objective -- prevent terrorist
attacks -- and its corresponding
critical mission areas of border and transportation security,
domestic counterterrorism, and intelligence and warning.
Block VI - Course Conclusion
(lessons 37-40). Block 6 ties the course together by
considering how best to integrate the issues and policies we have
explored throughout the course into a coherent and effective strategy that
best protects the nation from terrorism. In block 6, we
assess the status of the national effort to date, and consider
the way ahead. |
|